Nudismo ("Repor: En Pelotas") Viewing television yesterday I came across this article about nudism. The program of
BBC1 Repor emitted "naked" (
here along with "Shooting Stars" until 10/10/2008). It's always interesting to consider these issues that often arise on any given day. In Spain you can walk naked down the street without any problem, although many say it is not true exhibitionism. Exhibitionism is using it to draw attention to the rest, with the clear intent to shock and scare. Nudism is doing the same as always but naked. There are also people who make indecent dress.
A bit of history.
On the subject of nudity comes shame, and the first thing you should know to understand is to see with a little historical perspective. We began to dress simply by cold, nothing more, that's a fact. What to get the vine leaves in paradise I think I already passed, the first garments were not made to hide anything because most tapaban surely what was the back and certainly gave more heat than a leaf. First it was so abnormal to dress like naked now:
- Abnormal! - Yes, but what gustirrinín ... Over time it became customary dress, the norm, and what happens to be abnormal is to go undressed. Such a change takes generations to occur, and eventually all his life have been dressed, so it was rare to see other people naked in the usual context and when they occur may cause minimal surprise, this would be increasing, and come even look for a moment. Nor take long to appear the distinction of sites for men or women, with which it was known who themselves could be seen naked and who is not. There is a vicious circle that describes the situation: we wear because we have modesty modesty but also because we dress. In the beginning was the latter, but is reinforced by the first, this new feeling, a feedback that means that increasingly more of skin conceal and longer.
Thus, the fact that we now have is modesty that came as something temporary for a reason unrelated. To this we can add in recent years that naked not only unusual but also has been used as the main stimulus for sexual arousal, and has been exploited enough, besides giving the character of something forbidden as we know, is one of the things that they want to prove something. If we told
children "as you can imagine reading these books you will know" would become great readers. It is an exaggeration, yes, but not going so far off the subject, it is difficult for a child to read if you will cheer and say how wonderful it is but never do.
This, nudism "yes, no, yes or no? Sometimes when analyzing these things, especially on something as well as nudity is also known as naturism (although it includes most things), it is easy to fall into overestimating the past. It is more in touch with nature or are born naked (also born almost blind, small and shriveled, unable to speak, without morality ...). Not too much of reason as I explained earlier. But is that something has been so at the beginning does not mean you go on, things change, you have to do is try to make it wisely. True, we should not be scandalized by nudity and there is nothing to hide, and that is something that should be changed (this mania to consider a naked body and is immoral and pornographic). But that should not go naked seem odd not have to mean you have to go always naked. Why would not be strange that all men of the world could dress in hot pink does not mean that every man in the world have to dress in hot pink. It could be another form of dress: "Today I have blue shirt, pink ... or nothing?". But then, as we do not dress the same way everywhere, we could not go naked everywhere.
And you can not deny that how we dress is any indication, and how we do too. Many people call
prejudices, but there are a lot of prejudice with prejudice
. For starters, content can vary, but prejudice itself is inevitable. And is implicit and call it ugly sounds in social psychology is a term that is both a bit technical and a little understatement: TIP (Implicit Theory of Personality). This means we saw a characteristic feature can be attributed to that conduct, a way of being. This can be personal, acquired by experience
"Look, I've gone with 3 blondes and repeat step because they are all ..." Or less superficial "a person who smiles and can not be bad" , and also acquired from other oral or media. They are a form of superstition which in turn is only a problem caused by our virtue of linking events with better or worse results.
So what makes us get dressed? In addition to pockets and clothing, to dress is also a form of communication. Not all wear the same dress as long as not all over our lives. How we dress says something about us and our present state as possible. Not to be confused with the
"the way I see stir defines my personality and I am free to wear whatever I want whenever I want" . Usually when an item is said to describe someone's personality is very specific use of a particular garment rather than the personality that we identified as members of a group, and consider these people as the group he belongs. But we are who we are, we know that we can not always be dressed as you like.
The dress also allows us to adorn ourselves, to make us a little different every day. Know if the nudist / naturist tattoo deemed correct, but for example, that would be the only form of decoration that we could afford. And if not, does anyone with tattoos can not be naturalistic? And if we paint the body with something erasable, would that be less nudist naturist or less? There are tribes that are covered, tattoos, paint, and I doubt very less natural.
addition, to dress may be helpful to know what makes somebody work within a community. In a normal trade is to know who works there for his clothes, but also creates confusion, one can go casually Mediamarkt red shirt and jeans, and someone asks a question.
may also be useful to indicate the possible activity that someone does in a moment. Let's say a bus driver is starting up and sees a man running in that direction in a suit: that man is going to miss the bus. But it could also see someone in the same situation in sweats: just exercising.
Or you can tell the status of the person at that time. If we find a friend who is well dressed normally starts depreocuparse by their appearance, we interpret that is going through a bad time in some sense. This can be seen most things but I guess it never too many tracks. You can also go badly dressed normally and if we managed means that it will bind.
Go naked may be impractical, as seen in the story sometimes have to find other ways to bring things up (pockets in the hat, a necklace for mobile and purse ...) and also somewhat is somewhat unhygienic, just as they recognize, to always wear a sarong to sit in which must be very clear on what part you put the ass. I honestly, to have to walk wearing a sarong, I say that in hand, for every time I wear it feels ... for that I have a pair of shorts that do not bother much and so I spent the day taking off and putting the shorts of yore ...
And why deny it, it can also add some taste to dress your eyes, not only because then you can enjoy a naked body, but because the dress can be very good. It is also a source of entertainment: in a nudist village
can never play strip poker. In the movie "The King Spaz" (1991) , the nudes was taken to the limit at which the king could not see his wife naked. In one scene he said this:
"And the worst is that now the King wants to see the Queen naked, and you know father, after all husbands want to see their wives naked, eventually all the women to undress their husbands in the world, even thought there will come a day when women go naked into the street, you know how women are when they reveal their secrets.
- Naked women on the street? That's like not putting salt on the food!
And some reason you need.
I always curious coincidences are occurring when you read a book or watching a movie and feel that fits some of this. Asimov truth is that it be a continual sense of déjà vu : a man from our past who wrote about our (still very distant) future, and you can always try to go for the present. 
"The psychohistorians" First part of the book "Foundation" (1951), which is, in turn, the first volume written from the "trilogy of Foundations" or "The Cycle of Trantor" . Everything could more or less apply to the situation seen now on the American empire, a crisis that apparently it was to be a long time but nothing was done to avoid it, and that despite being there, shows us a U.S. which remain powerful (at least in appearance .) It is specifically a conversation in the book Seldon, mathematical scientist who has planned the end of Empire, and a government lawyer trying to charge him as a liar and traitor 
